EDIT: K' is posted on the wiki as well.
You are the man, insanely helpful when you guys do this. I'll get on it.
Re: Style - the dustloop stuff would be great if we had the resources (or if our current wiki team can get inspired enough to pull it off). Definitely looks good. It does assume that we have a complete set of frame stuff for all the chrs to match it as is. This shouldn't stop us from keeping that sort of layout in mind.
Re: Separate pages - Rather than support separate pages which can be tedious to manage, it'd be a lot better if we had collapsible sections for the large lengthy bits. Looking into it, Mediawiki supports jQuery or JS, etc. Trying some out, I don't think we have it installed on our deployment. We'd all be able to use it pretty easily. The latter can be used in the same table format we've been working with recently for example (apparently we don't have jQuery installed either)>
{| class="wikitable collapsible"
! K' moves and stuff
|-
| Here are the moves that would be hidden if we had this feature turned on
|}
Is this something nilcam can look into? Would make a big difference.
Re: special cmds in table - At first I thought this would make tables too dense, until I saw that Kane had done it in his duo lon table. Looks good, lets add these next to the move name - another problem I saw was that the move name translations for the images at the very top must've been very early translations, bc many don't match what the English should be. This will help clear up the confusion.